Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. So.. its like there is one F stop not being used by the lens..how do you know what click is for what F stop?? But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. For those of you that like to pixel-peep, have a look at the single image frame captured using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. Would you recommend a collar/support for the lens? I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not . Now I wonder why people are never happy even on 3rd day of a new year :) Come on guys just think "Micael Widell" was working over holiday period to publish this free article ;). Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. I am no stranger to the full manual control of this lens, for both aperture and focus. In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. The best ones listed below serve well with a one stop reduction, and some require two or even three stops. Better than nothing I guess, would depend on how much it raises the price. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. It's not the most versatile lens, but it's very great for tight portrait shoots; background blur is creamy IMO; one of the best 'bokeh' lens. Several functions may not work. The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. Beautiful portrait lens. Perhaps you have seen the photos of masterful Russian portrait photographers such as Elena Shumilova or Anka Zhuravleva. I have taken some of the coolest photos with this lens on a canon mark III which shoots ten frames per second. It seems lazy to me. I got this lens because of portraiture. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). Below, are a few examples of astrophotography images Ive taken with lenses of varying focal lengths. Manual focus on wide angle lens, for landscapes, ok, if you have a reliable manual focus system, which Samyang, at least in my mount, does not have. Got it! IQ will rival any other lens. I have an old 135/2.5 Takumar that is not bad at all, for the price. Especially for beginning astrophotographers, who should first invest most of their finances into a good telescope mount, telephoto lenses are an excellent and affordable solution. It also focuses really fast and accurate and is light. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count.So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. An h-alpha filter would still be useful for your D500, but much more so if it were modified! I'm not a fan of the large hood. You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. When I was teaching photography in 70's at a junior college, I critiqued students photos, but I never did so harshly. I wanted to add my experience with some lenses that I thought worthy of being considered too, and some of the equipment that I have used. Really like the large focusing ring. And if you want autofocus, I would recommend the Canon 135mm f2.0L, which is incredibly light for its performance at just 750g. http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/01/canon-135mm-f2l-usm-mini-review.html Optics quality, sharp,very special picture, sharpness, clarity, weight, fast, accurate AF (fringe benefit of f/2), price, no IS, makes you regret buying any zoom lenses, compact, very sharp wide open, good color contrast, bokeh, this is the lens. The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. thanks for the tiring patronising lecture and then agreeing with me. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. With the high megapixel cameras, most people are going to ideally want to shoot at 1/200 or faster. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. The 135 f/2 is not perfect. PRICE. Backwards compatible (film). It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. But If you want the "look" you get with a medium telephoto at f/2, hen all those negatives become irrelevant. It's March, and in America that means it's time to start arguing over which college athletics team is the best at basketball. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open Please send your photos of the Andromeda galaxy. Nikon 300/4 ED IF, Sigma 50/2.8 DG Macro (not a telephoto, but good). I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. At $900 US it a relative steal. However, all the reviews were made by nature and sports photographers, and I would like to find out more about their performance in astrophotography. Its actually kind of neat to watch! On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? This is the EF-M series version. The next 200mm lens of excellent quality is the 200mm F4 Nikkor F which requires the Nikon F to EOS adapter. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with "ED" standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the "ultra multi-coated" optics. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. Tack sharp at f/2. I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. When you shoot a 135mm F2 lens at F2, your subject will stand out in this beautiful way, often without much work needed from you as the photographer. Super sharp from f2. But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. Selecting between it and the 200mm Takumar was not an easy choice but, in the end, I chose the Takumar because it seemed to have slightly better contrast. I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies. It's tiny compared to almost everything else in the 85-135 range, and used properly, it can produce results that hold up to my DC (all other factors being equal such as subject distance, f-stop, lighting, etc.). These lenses go about as close as you could get without a dedicated macro lens. But, since fast 300mm ED lenses are beyond my toy budget, I would appreciate seeing magnified center and corner test images of actual star fields. Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. Definitely now on my to-buy list. The image shown below covers 4.96 x 5.98 degrees in the constellation Cassiopeia. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. Andysea, those are great images on your website. the EOS-clip filters are compatible with all EF lenses but not with the EF-s. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. Yes, it is about the same as 85mm f/1.4 blur factor is 60mm, while 135mm f/2 blur factor is 67mm. If you aren't completely set on the 135mm, the 200mm f/2.8L is a fantastic lens and i think its less expensive than the 135mm f/2L. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. This lens provides all of these requirements. Well, for me. I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. I really like how they augment my longer focal length scopes. Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. You're sour grapes man, you wish it were you who wrote the article. f/2! I had of course heard that this lens is supposed to be very sharp, but I had never before had such a full blown "wow" experience when reviewing the sharpness of a lens. I read and bought it. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. Diffraction from the cheap EF-s kit zoom lens was uneven. Many lenses lose their appeal after time, but not this one. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. Let's the games begin! This is actually worse than just plain obsession with blur. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. Sure, if you scroll through his page there are quite a few lens tests on starshttps://www.flickr.chotos/ytoropin/, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, Article: The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography, This is not recommended for shared computers, Review of Explore Scientific First Light 8, COUNTING SUNSPOTS WITH A $10 OPTICAL TUBE ASSEMBLY, Hubble Optics 14 inch Dobsonian - Part 2: The SiTech GoTo system, iStar Opticals Phantom FCL 140-6.5 review. So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Personally, I can't stand these circles, and I see them as VERY distracting.Lots of fads come and go, and this is just another one of these fads that some photographers are obsessed with. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. The CA is pretty low wide open and it rivals my 200mm L lens. It could really use an update to its coatings. But again i am just at the beginning and i also do not want to use now a telescope. I have a vintage Nikon135mm f/2.8 AI-s which produces virtually the same bokeh and weighs a quarter of this or any other 135mm AF lens. Available Monday. Adam007,"a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels"No thanks. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. @juksu - you're such a hypocrite. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. Chromatic aberration is almost eliminated in narrowband, so lenses with that problem may be fine performers. Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). Oh and it's stabilised. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. (purchased for $845), reviewed November 16th, 2005 This free website's biggest source of support is when you use these links, especially these directly to it at Adorama or at Amazon, when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. I cant decide whether to clean it up in processing or let it be. The flat lens hood design allows you to easily take flat frames with the Rokinon 135mm using the white t-shirt method or using a flat panel. In excellent condition, this lens retails for around $200. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. If the telescope mount is precisely aligned to the celestial north pole, unguided exposures of one to two minutes are possible. Well saturated but neutral. RATING. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. If the title had been: "Testing My First Telephoto and LOVING IT!!!!!!!. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. A Bargain, very competively priced Samyang 85mm f1.83. I've been using a vintage FD 135/3.5 on my A7R IV as a compact tele option, often alongside a tiny Samyang 75/1.8. Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. My Rokinon 135F2 on my crop body is fun to play with.. a budget lens with budget construction on a discontinued camera system.. but hey im just a ham and egger https://flic.kr/p/21nj82V, I had a Canon 135/2 for a while, but I decided I preferred the 100 L used not as a Macro but a normal lens (which my non-L USM 100 Macro was quite poor for). For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats. I ordered this lens on Amazon, utilizing my Amazon Prime membership. If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. The interest of a f/1.4 is to be able to be perfect at f/2.8, while a f/1.8 or f/2 might need to be on f/4 to have the same sharpeness and overall IQ.They are not meant to be used wide open, except in rare moments. (purchased for $900), reviewed August 22nd, 2008 That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. By the way, I still enjoy using my very sharp Sears 135mm, PKA mount lens. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. I disagree. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. Check them out for yourself! Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. when you hold the lens in your hand you know you are holding a fine peice of optical equipment. The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. Focus end stop. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. Required fields are marked *. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. Given the spot on DPR front page, lots of 'what-lens-should-I-buy' newbies will be spending their money on this one. So I feel I'm being cheated. Which is the better buy? Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. for sample photos and video tour, This is simply the best Canon prime lens that I have tested. Over the years, Ive shot deep-sky targets at varying focal lengths from 50mm to over 1000mm. You would be hard pressed to find any other lens on a full frame camera that produces creamier bokeh. The flawless image quality is only half the story though. These lenses can be had on eBay in mint condition for around $70, and are probably the most price efficient optical instrument in the world. Creamy smooth bokeh. The reason the 135mm lens was that it was the longest lens that would focus with a Leica rangefinder. The Samyang 135mm f/2 lens is very wide in astrophotography terms. Here's what I see from the photographs:#1: Woman in traffic. Light weight and robust. Bond, I expect you to buy! Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. Depth of field at f/2 on the 135 is so shallow that I usually shot it stopped down to f/2.8 or f/4 anyway. Reducing aperture with the built-in aperture iris interferes with the light path, and results in eight diffraction spikes around bright star images. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 4th, 2006 He's better than I am on BS, I got to give him that. This brings me to my question. I've done comparisons between my brand-new Samyang 85/1.4 and the old big Apollo 135/1.8 lens I had lying around, and the shots were for all practical purposes identical (exept, obviously, for the pixel count once cropped). Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. No, Mr. I bought a Fotasy Minolta MD->EOSM adapter off ebay for $11, and then for about $20 each on craigs list really sharp, well built Minolta MC 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, and 135mm f2.8 lenses that turned out to be great for astrophotography. But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. Seems like a great lens. I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. The model I use feels solid and the barrel is constructed with metal. Big F-value.Light. The closest Ive been to the 135mm range is 105mm on my Canon 24-105 zoom. the lens is built strong, very strong. 21P Giacobini Zinner NGC1499 California Barnard 8 Cr399 Coathanger North America and Pelican Veil nebula HORGB M11 cluster area There is no such thing, in my opinion. If experience has taught me anything, its that the practical, pain-free equipment that gets the most use under the stars. That whole rig comes to about $1200, minus the mount. However, I find the process tedious, and prefer single, manually guided, long exposures which seem to have deeper colors. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. The author's recipe for a good photo is:1) Just shoot blindly, with no regard to what's in the frame, because the lens will blur away everything on the background.2) If (1) does not work, just head on to https://www.bhphotovideo.com, download a jpg of the lens you were using, and photoshop it on top of the taillaits of the passig car that didn't get blurred out enough.3?) I use the word design, because although the available 135mm F2 lenses aren't the exact same optical formula, they share many important traits. Perfect lens on the same level as CZ! Same thing as people mistake "shallow DOF" to blurry background. There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. In the middle of the OM System lineup, the OM-5 promises yesterday's top-tier performance in a lighter, more compact body. When i just judge by the indicator line as i click through, it seems like its 19 that gets skipped wondering if there is anything more definite? No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. The aperture range of this lens is F/2 to F/22, with 9 diaphragm blades (aperture blades) that work in harmony to set your f-stop. Meanwhile the ol' Canon 135/2 is still commanding a higher than average price on the used market (70%+ of MSRP isn't common), I guess the low weight and super easy resale have almost made it a high end commodity. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. In the right hands this lens really does have "magic pixie dust", as a friend once described. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). It's a technical review about a couple of lens attributes. In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. Neutral yet very nice colours. How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? The 135mm f2 is by all accounts one of their better and more reliable lenses however I believe the chance of a defective lens is lower with the Canon. Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. Amazing for portraits, easily fast enough for indoor sports. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. Holiday Savings $50 . I have no experience with that lens, Jerry Lodriguss however published a review of that lens on his websitehttp://www.astropix.NIKON_180MM.HTM. Aperture ring. its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. That setup will give you all that you really need. This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. The 135L is half the weight of the 70-200 2.8IS. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. However, they can be perfectly corrected with narrow band H-alpha or OIII filters. Now we have to read this kind of ignorant misinformation on DPR articles. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. I prefer this lens than the 70-200/2.8. I would never shell out hundreds of euros for a 135 prime let alone one with manual focus. 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. My guidescope is a 5in F5 Jaeger's achromat with a 2.3x Barlow, and a 9mm illuminated reticle eyepiece. Interesting. Instead it means the style of rendering. To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. Show some humility and don't troll. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. Here is a short list of great astrophotography targets to shoot at 135mm with this lens: Below, is an incredible example of the types of projects possible with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 lens. I have used the canon 70-200 f2.8L ii and also the 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L with excellent results. (AVX). I find neither the cat nor the duck particularly good. Comment * document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a0721c0ca7d0974fd27b5d0ceb81918a" );document.getElementById("cfd2c22fe2").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Your email address will not be published. I've tested some of the old Pentax 6x7 lenses with a friend. Dear Trevor, Used on a crop body the results are still splendid but you gain on DOF, making it a great combination for wedding/event and ambient/available light. My work requires auto-focus. (purchased for $725), reviewed March 26th, 2013 I would! One way to combat potential soft images and chasing perfect focus all night is to stop the lens down to F/2.8 or even F/4. And because you can shoot between F/2 and F/4, plenty of light reaches the sensor in a relatively short exposure. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. Let's dig in. The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography.
Town And Country Porterville, Ca Weekly Ad,
Small Knotless Braids,
Felicity Vuolo Syndrome,
Property For Renovation In Kefalonia,
3 Types Of Undercover Operations,
Articles C
| hamilton physicians group patient portal | |||
| california high school track and field records | |||